Was Lamarck's explanation scientific, why or why not?

I think it was scietific.

Note of editor: Yes it was. Scientific doesn't mean true. Scientific means possible of being evaluated by empiric tests and consequently possible of being refuted. Even though it was surpassed by Darwin's theory, Lamarck's theory doesn't lost its scientific character.

Click here to post answer.

Return to Biology Question.

give us a tip using crypto

BTC: 3G1AGoAddUPYaLbTAo6hvKFnt7kNz4dXjz
ETH: 0x256e8a87ab9c5f879696dadf6cdbd37613d9ffac
DOGE: DEKXxbY9FFP56y7sdyzBvTSRPbP5h1RU2p
LTC: MLA9BuoUYK4PKnwxmKR5r1z8f2mKdAa7vf
XMR: 46k6hLyn4dtWJbABdtt3ms1GnNJSwBG2g9Qjk5DfPgHBhcRpicktW692pYGFiyojttDVEBwAiosyrEMGggGyZPJUM9cwPmx
USDT: 0x256e8a87ab9c5f879696dadf6cdbd37613d9ffac
USDC: 0x256e8a87ab9c5f879696dadf6cdbd37613d9ffac